austin-daye.jpg

 

By Michael DeStefano

Smaller mid-majors always seem to be in the midst of debates.
Do most of them deserve to be in the tournament? Why should they get automatic
bids for winning a conference full of inferior teams when better teams from
the Big East, ACC, or other major conferences are kept out? The same questions
are always asked, and then a mid-major goes out and knocks off a team from a
power conference and is billed as a Cinderella. The fact is that these teams
can play, and these kids can play. Despite being small schools comprised of
low-profile recruits, (or in some cases like Memphis, an elite team in a ghost
town conference) some of these players find themselves in perfect situations
to get better without the pressure and lofty expectations. That’s why NBA scouts
are heading out to watch Gonzaga and other mid-majors in the hopes of finding
a diamond in the ruff. This year, there are several out there.

(Last year’s number one pick, Derrick Rose, came
from Memphis, a school that technically (considering the conference: Conference
USA) is labeled a mid-major)

 
 

Austin Daye

 

Top 5 Prospects:

  1. Austin Daye (Gonzaga)
    He’s got the length and shooting stroke to be a matchup nightmare in the League
    a la Kevin Durant. He can catch-and-shoot or shoot off the dribble, and he
    has a variety of moves to get by his defenders when they pressure him on the
    perimeter. His array of skills make him an extremely dangerous scorer. He
    has the length to wreak havoc on both ends of the floor, and just needs to
    get a little stronger to utilize his athleticism and finish at the rim. Averages
    of 11 points and 5 rebounds don’t jump out at you, but he only played 18 minutes
    per game as a freshman. Furthermore, he averaged almost 2 blocks per game.
    He needs to put on weight (only 190 at 6’10), and that added strength will
    help him become a better defender at the next level. The sky’s the limit for
    this kid. He’ll need to show that the off-season knee injury is not a concern,
    but he’s got lottery potential if he plays up to his potential.
  2. Stephen Curry (Davidson)
    – Everyone’s favorite player in the country last year, Curry had one of the
    most memorable and impressive tournaments in NCAA history. 40 against Gonzaga
    (including 8 threes) in the 1st round. 30 against a tough Hoya defense in
    the next round. 33 in a 17-point blowout of Wisconsin, one of the best defensive
    teams in the country, in the Sweet Sixteen. Nevertheless, people doubt his
    ability to make it in the NBA. He’s too small and too weak, they say. First
    of all, anyone who shoots the way Curry does will find a place in the League.
    His form is beautiful, his release is lightning quick, and his range seems
    limitless. Like Reggie Miller or Rip Hamilton, he moves great without the
    ball and has incredible stamina, enabling him to wear down his defender to
    get open shots or backdoor lay-ups. Secondly, there’s no reason to doubt his
    ability to improve. He works hard, and he knows what it takes to make it (thanks
    to being the son of former NBA player Dell Curry. The main concern will be
    his ability to run a team at the next level. Regardless, another season like
    last year (26 points, 5 rebounds, 2 steals per game) will put Curry in the
    lottery.
  3. Derrick Brown (Xavier)
    – Another player whose numbers don’t jump off the page, Derrick Brown averaged
    11 and 7 for a very good Xavier team last year. Drew Lavender, Josh Duncan,
    and Stanley Burrell are gone, so his production will increase in a big way.
    A projected lottery pick in ’09, Brown is an athletic freak, seen in the way
    he led Xavier in both rebounding and dunks last year. He is great in the open
    floor and tries to finish everything with power. He didn’t shoot many 3’s
    last year, and while 35% from beyond the arc isn’t terrible, there is clearly
    much room for improvement. He needs to show scouts that he can score consistently
    from the outside. His quick first step is a plus, but he needs to work on
    his ball-handling and shooting to thrive in the NBA. He’s got the physical
    gifts to be a good defender in the League; he just needs to show the effort.
    After a great summer, a strong season will ensure a spot in the lottery for
    Brown.
  4. Patrick Mills (St. Mary’s)
    – If you’re a basketball fan and didn’t know who Patrick Mills was last spring,
    you should certainly know his name now after a great performance in the Olympics.
    He averaged 15 points and 4 assists per game as a freshman last year, then
    scored 20 against Chris Paul and Deron Williams in Beijing over the summer
    for Australia. Playing and excelling against grown men in the Olympics can
    only help Mills in the long run as he gets ready for his sophomore year and,
    eventually, the NBA. His speed and skills make up for his lack of size. It
    would serve him well to improve his outside shot (32% from 3 last season),
    but there’s no questioning his potential. He’ll be a first-rounder when he
    decides to come out.
  5. Jerome Jordan (Tulsa)
    – Size (7’1), length, and mobility are Jordan’s greatest
    strengths right now. He’s an intriguing prospect for a few reasons. On the
    defensive end, he’s shown good timing when blocking shots, effective to the
    tune of 3.7 blocks per game last year. And he has the potential to get better
    in this area (almost 5 per game over his last six games). He shoots almost
    70% from the line which gives scouts hope that he’ll be able to develop some
    sort of a mid-range game, and despite his lack of post moves, he still averaged
    almost 11 points per game as a sophomore. Yet, he is still very raw. He needs
    to add muscle; he needs to add a post game; he needs to become more fundamental
    on the defensive end and stop relying solely on his shot-blocking prowess.
    Comparisons to former mid-major center Patrick O’Bryant bode well for Jordan’s
    chances of becoming a lottery pick, but Bryant’s struggles in the NBA are
    not too reassuring. Reaching his potential will take a lot of hard work and
    improvement, and it will be interesting to see the strides he can take over
    the next two years.

Others receiving consideration: Eric
Maynor (Virginia Commonwealth)
, Tyreke Evans
(Memphis)
, Willie Kemp (Memphis), Chris
Wright (Dayton)
, Lester Hudson (Tenn-Martin),
Lorrenzo Wade (San Diego St.), Robert
Vaden (UAB)
, Russell Hicks (FIU)

Sleeper: Josh
Heytvelt (Gonzaga)

Heytvelt is an enigma. He has the talent, size, and athleticism that say he
should excel playing in a mid-major conference. Yet, he only scored 10 points
per game last year. In the WCC Championship game, he scored only 8 points against
San Diego. In the first round against a small Davidson team, only 12 points.
He also averaged less than 5 rebound per game last year while blocking only
fifteen shots in 22 games. Then again, there’s the time as a sophomore when
he he thoroughly out-played Tyler Hansbrough. Heytvelt gets the benefit of the
doubt since he missed the first 11 games, so we’ll see how he performs with
a full season under his belt. Nevertheless, injury history and off-the-court
issues are taken into consideration and will hurt his stock. A good team with
established leaders will select Heytvelt towards the end of the first round,
possibly getting a steal if he can stay healthy and keep his head on straight.

Facebooktwitterredditmail

6 Comments

  1. Ahmad Nivins
    This guy isn’t even on the draft board, and he’s one of the best under-the-radar power forwards in the NCAA. Coming from the A-10, he’s probably overlooked in the NCAA power forward discussion, but he’s still an absolute beast. 19.3ppg, 11.1rpg, 2.1bpg and shooting 66.5% from the field are stats any power forward would be proud of. He’s also shooting 74% from the free throw line, which isn’t shabby at all. He’s also got an NBA power forward body at 6’9″, 242lbs. I don’t have any idea why he’s not even in the discussion as even a 2nd round pick. Why don’t you believe he’s in the discussion?

  2. Tiffany Online Store
    Tiffany Online Store provides brand new tiffany & co silver jewelry with high quality. Enjoy your tiffany jewelry shopping with quick shipping and best
    tiffany jewelry,tiffany co jewelry,
    Tiffany Style Silver Jewelry: Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Bracelets and more Tiffany Jewelry at low prices
    Tiffany Jewellery.tiffany co
    Tiffany Rings,
    Tiffany & Co Jewelry Outlet Online Store Sells Various Kinds of Cheap Tiffany’s Silver Jewelry, Including Rings, Necklaces, Pendants, Earrings Tiffany Bracelets
    Tiffany Necklaces

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.