This topic contains 90 replies, has 16 voices, and was last updated by
The Garbage Man 10 years, 4 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 5:19am #62621

valentine
In a league where Olynyk Effect is increasingly the best barometer to predict and explain team success, or lack thereof, former stars and would be future stars are finding themselves too outdated for the New NBA all the time.
Roy Hibbert? Game passed him by.
Mozgov? Good bye yellow brick road.
Jahlil Okafor? You had your 15 minutes of fame. Literally. Now your game belongs in a museum.
Greg Monroe? A weak big with no D and no range on his shot? Flopping in MIL, and not in a good way.
Jabari Parker? Stick a fork in him.
Julius Randle? How many no shooting range, no D busts do you need to see fail before you start to change the way you think about talent evaluation?
So now we have Ben Simmons, who everybody who sucks at talent evaluation has declared to be the next big star.
These Steven A Smith type wankers want you to believe Simmons is sure thing for the #1 pick, and that nobody else has a chance to be #1.
Why do they believe this? Because somebody else told them what to think, and they don’t know better.
If you STILL don’t understand that 3 point shooting has HUGE value beyond just the points scored from there, you haven’t been watching the NBA this year.
If you STILL don’t realize that just drawing defenders out to the 3 point line creates increased offensive efficiency and production, you just don’t know basketball.
And if you STILL think Ben "Wallace" Simmons is the top talent in next year’s draft, you’re probably still waiting for Evan "#2 Pick" Turner to develop his 3 point shot.
Even if Brandon Ingram wasn’t a much better defender than Simmons, with much more defensive upside, Ingram would still be the better prospect than Simmons.
While Simmons may be putting up slightly better stats than Ingram, and padding his assist #s with flashy passes, he’s not actually making his team much better.
Meanwhile, Brandon Ingram is providing much more value to his team, and his ability to draw opposing PFs and SFs out to the 3 point line is creating untold layups for his teammates.
Standing at the 3 point line when your teammate makes a layup doesn’t get you on Sportscenter like a flashy pass for a layup, but credibly drawing defenses out to the 3 point line creates layups just as much as that flashy passing.
The game is changing, folks, and these lame ass Jabari Parker/Ben Simmons type tweeners are a relic of the old days, back when an Evan Turner and Jabari could be the #2 pick without triggering outbursts of laughter.
Get with the times.
Ingram has all time great potential, just as Porzingis does, and clearly did even a year ago.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 5:51am #1039716

DaGuywhodidurmaParticipantWhen I look at Ingram I can’t find any huge flaws aside from his weight and even then I think he has the frame to get stronger.
If I had the number one pick I’d pick Ingram over Simmons as well. And it’s not that I don’t think Simmons will be really good, it’s just that I see his skill set as that of a 2nd or 3rd option as a complimentary piece rather than a guy to build around.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 5:51am #1039851

DaGuywhodidurmaParticipantWhen I look at Ingram I can’t find any huge flaws aside from his weight and even then I think he has the frame to get stronger.
If I had the number one pick I’d pick Ingram over Simmons as well. And it’s not that I don’t think Simmons will be really good, it’s just that I see his skill set as that of a 2nd or 3rd option as a complimentary piece rather than a guy to build around.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 6:02am #1039722
trappedintheclosetPrediction: just like Porzingis and his wet 3 point shot ended up being a better player than Okafor and Russell, Dragan Bender will end up being the more valuable player than Ben Simmons.
Bender might even end up being drafted before Simmons, though bad talent evaluators tend to get the top draft picks, and blow it year after year.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:33am #1039969

holefillers1ParticipantIt took you 37 posts to get -205 points. I could have done it in 25. No big deal.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:33am #1039834

holefillers1ParticipantIt took you 37 posts to get -205 points. I could have done it in 25. No big deal.
0
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 6:02am #1039857
trappedintheclosetPrediction: just like Porzingis and his wet 3 point shot ended up being a better player than Okafor and Russell, Dragan Bender will end up being the more valuable player than Ben Simmons.
Bender might even end up being drafted before Simmons, though bad talent evaluators tend to get the top draft picks, and blow it year after year.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:09am #1039734

Sewok15ParticipantIngram will be a nice NBA player for sure but if you think that his effect on the Duke team is greater than Simmons on LSU I have no idea what you are watching. Duke has underachieved this year and I would say both teams are pretty equal when you look at common opponents and watch them play. You have to take into consideration who Ingram is playing with (5 other McDonald’s All Americans) compared to Simmons (One other All American in Blakeny who finally played a good game yesterday).
LSU can’t even get Simmons the ball half the time unless he brings it up the court. He shot 6-7 from the field yesterday which is unacceptable but I think it is on coaching and his teammates as much as his perceived lack of assertiveness. If Simmons were playing for Coach K at Duke they would be a top 10 team and if Ingram were on that LSU team they probably wouldn’t even make the tournament.
I understand the importance of the three point line in the NBA but never would I consider taking Buddy Hield over Simmons because he can shoot better…that is over looking so much about Simmons game that makes him special. I just wish he would have went to play for a good team with a proven coach to showcase his skills better.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:25am #1039877
trappedintheclosetBuddy Hield is 6’4 with limited athleticism. Ingram is 6’9.5 at a minimum, with a 9’2" standing reach. Probably a full foot higher than Hield.
I can see why you’re having problems seeing than Ingram is the superior prospect to Simmons.
The same way you probably thought Giannis and Monroe and Jabari would help make MIL a decent team this year.
Because no, you don’t fully appreciate the value of spreading the floor.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:25am #1039742
trappedintheclosetBuddy Hield is 6’4 with limited athleticism. Ingram is 6’9.5 at a minimum, with a 9’2" standing reach. Probably a full foot higher than Hield.
I can see why you’re having problems seeing than Ingram is the superior prospect to Simmons.
The same way you probably thought Giannis and Monroe and Jabari would help make MIL a decent team this year.
Because no, you don’t fully appreciate the value of spreading the floor.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:43am #1039883

Sewok15ParticipantIngram is tall but he doesn’t play big at all. The only thing he uses his height for is getting off jump shots. I actually was suspect about the Bucks this year because their lack of floor spacing on offense. You can’t play that ma
ny players at a time that can’t shoot. Giannis and MCW on the court at the same time doesnt work. Even If I am a team like the Bucks who desperately needs shooting I am taking Simmons over everyone else without question.
You don’t take Ryan Anderson over Anthony Davis because he is a better three point shooter.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:43am #1039748

Sewok15ParticipantIngram is tall but he doesn’t play big at all. The only thing he uses his height for is getting off jump shots. I actually was suspect about the Bucks this year because their lack of floor spacing on offense. You can’t play that ma
ny players at a time that can’t shoot. Giannis and MCW on the court at the same time doesnt work. Even If I am a team like the Bucks who desperately needs shooting I am taking Simmons over everyone else without question.
You don’t take Ryan Anderson over Anthony Davis because he is a better three point shooter.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:48am #1039885
trappedintheclosetIngram is already a good/great shot blocker, and has played extended minutes at PF this year. Part of what makes him as/more valuable than Simmons. Ingram can play SG, SF, and PF at the college and NBA level.
All Simmons can do is play with the ball in his hands. He can’t even score outside of 5 feet, and even then he needs non-conference Washington Generals type defenses to bully for buckets.
People thought Jabari could play the SF and PF, or at least one of them. Turns out he can’t play either. Same with Randle.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:48am #1039750
trappedintheclosetIngram is already a good/great shot blocker, and has played extended minutes at PF this year. Part of what makes him as/more valuable than Simmons. Ingram can play SG, SF, and PF at the college and NBA level.
All Simmons can do is play with the ball in his hands. He can’t even score outside of 5 feet, and even then he needs non-conference Washington Generals type defenses to bully for buckets.
People thought Jabari could play the SF and PF, or at least one of them. Turns out he can’t play either. Same with Randle.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 6:06pm #1039954

HeroescantdieParticipantI would pick a 6’9 6’10 LBJ with less athletecism than carmelo anthony in a durant’s body
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 6:31pm #1039962
trappedintheclosetIngram is even skinnier than Durant was, and that works to Ingram’s advantage. He’s quicker on D than Durant was, which means that he’s going to be a better defender than Durant was/is. Durant gets shredded when he has to defend SGs and PGs. Ingram, not so much.
Ben Simmons might be a soft, chill Australian like Exum.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 6:44pm #1039968
Hype Machinelol @ soft chill aussies. What’s the alternative…dirty delly aussies?
Haha I’m pretty sure Exum is gay. I dunno if you’re allowed to suggest that in this politically correct era…he just has that tone in his voice. I still think he’s going to be a top 5 PG in the league if he recovers 100%.
And I dunno how Joe Ingles keeps passing the leagues drug testing, cos he always so relaxed and looks like he’s just smoked a giant blunt.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 6:44pm #1040103
Hype Machinelol @ soft chill aussies. What’s the alternative…dirty delly aussies?
Haha I’m pretty sure Exum is gay. I dunno if you’re allowed to suggest that in this politically correct era…he just has that tone in his voice. I still think he’s going to be a top 5 PG in the league if he recovers 100%.
And I dunno how Joe Ingles keeps passing the leagues drug testing, cos he always so relaxed and looks like he’s just smoked a giant blunt.
0
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 6:31pm #1040097
trappedintheclosetIngram is even skinnier than Durant was, and that works to Ingram’s advantage. He’s quicker on D than Durant was, which means that he’s going to be a better defender than Durant was/is. Durant gets shredded when he has to defend SGs and PGs. Ingram, not so much.
Ben Simmons might be a soft, chill Australian like Exum.
0
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 6:06pm #1040089

HeroescantdieParticipantI would pick a 6’9 6’10 LBJ with less athletecism than carmelo anthony in a durant’s body
0
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:50am #1039887
trappedintheclosetIngram also uses his length to contort and score over guys in the paint.
I really don’t think you’ve watched a single game, and you’re just clinging to your pre-season (mis)understanding of Simmons and Ingram’s games.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:50am #1039752
trappedintheclosetIngram also uses his length to contort and score over guys in the paint.
I really don’t think you’ve watched a single game, and you’re just clinging to your pre-season (mis)understanding of Simmons and Ingram’s games.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:53am #1039889
trappedintheclosetYour Ryan Anderson Anthony Davis analogy is also bogus. Not only is Ingram a much much more complete player than Ryan Anderson, but Anderson’s impact on the game is actually head and shoulders better than Anthony Davis this year.
Take a look at their +/- difference, despite starting together and playing much of their minutes together.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:53am #1039754
trappedintheclosetYour Ryan Anderson Anthony Davis analogy is also bogus. Not only is Ingram a much much more complete player than Ryan Anderson, but Anderson’s impact on the game is actually head and shoulders better than Anthony Davis this year.
Take a look at their +/- difference, despite starting together and playing much of their minutes together.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:05am #1039901

Sewok15ParticipantIf you are going to go with +/- and ignore every other advanved metric that says Davis is better than Anderson you could make the argument that Toney Douglas and Alexis Ajinca are better than Davis too…but that would be crazy.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:05am #1039766

Sewok15ParticipantIf you are going to go with +/- and ignore every other advanved metric that says Davis is better than Anderson you could make the argument that Toney Douglas and Alexis Ajinca are better than Davis too…but that would be crazy.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:23am #1039909
trappedintheclosetDouglas and Anjina barely play, but Anderson and Davis both play about the same minutes, and they both start so they’re on the court together most of the time.
Davis’ defense is grossly overrated, although people are figuring out that besides blocks, he’s basically not much better defensively than Anderson. Just two soft PFs, except Anderson spreads the floor more so that guys like Tyreke can get buckets.
I’m not saying I’d rather have Anderson than Davis over the long term, but Davis and his game are so fragile and soft that all the high profile commercials in the world can’t keep the casual fan like yourself from catching on.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:23am #1039774
trappedintheclosetDouglas and Anjina barely play, but Anderson and Davis both play about the same minutes, and they both start so they’re on the court together most of the time.
Davis’ defense is grossly overrated, although people are figuring out that besides blocks, he’s basically not much better defensively than Anderson. Just two soft PFs, except Anderson spreads the floor more so that guys like Tyreke can get buckets.
I’m not saying I’d rather have Anderson than Davis over the long term, but Davis and his game are so fragile and soft that all the high profile commercials in the world can’t keep the casual fan like yourself from catching on.
0
-
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:53am #1039891
trappedintheclosetWhen Simmons team sucks as much as Anthony Davis’ team in the NBA, I’m sure you’ll have tons of excuses.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:53am #1039756
trappedintheclosetWhen Simmons team sucks as much as Anthony Davis’ team in the NBA, I’m sure you’ll have tons of excuses.
0
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:03am #1039897
Magic JordanParticipantWell you thought the Celtics would be the best team in the East this year. Terry Rozier was a better prospect than D Russell (not even close). Marcus Smart would be better than Jsmes Harden and countless other completely stupid proclamations. In fact, I am having a hard time remembering something you were right about.
So of history as any indication of future success (hint, it is) then pretty much everything you are saying about Ingram will be wrong. For this reason alone I am now doubling down on Simmons. If T Rex doesn’t think he’ll be good, most likely that means he will be great.
This guy has had like 15 accounts banned, can we add this one to the list.
The best part is it would be incredibly easy for you to create an account and just blend in. But you’re such a sociopath that you can’t do that. Look at you already filling up your own posts with your own replies. The only other person that does that is SlickBouncePass.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:03am #1039762
Magic JordanParticipantWell you thought the Celtics would be the best team in the East this year. Terry Rozier was a better prospect than D Russell (not even close). Marcus Smart would be better than Jsmes Harden and countless other completely stupid proclamations. In fact, I am having a hard time remembering something you were right about.
So of history as any indication of future success (hint, it is) then pretty much everything you are saying about Ingram will be wrong. For this reason alone I am now doubling down on Simmons. If T Rex doesn’t think he’ll be good, most likely that means he will be great.
This guy has had like 15 accounts banned, can we add this one to the list.
The best part is it would be incredibly easy for you to create an account and just blend in. But you’re such a sociopath that you can’t do that. Look at you already filling up your own posts with your own replies. The only other person that does that is SlickBouncePass.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:18am #1039905
trappedintheclosetRozier is better than Russell, he’s just stuck behind an All Star in Isaiah, and a DPOY candidate in Smart.
Russell would be playing in the DLeague too if he wasn’t on the Lakers or 76ers.
And of course I was right about Randle being a bust too, just like I was right about Porzingis being a Hall of Famer even before the regular season started.
I could go on and on.
Even my shakiest prediction, that Andrew Harrison is no worse than D Russell, is to be determined.
But congrats on your #2 pick not being sent down to DLeague yet.
And he probably won’t, since he’s already being showcased for trades, just like Stauskas before him.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:18am #1039770
trappedintheclosetRozier is better than Russell, he’s just stuck behind an All Star in Isaiah, and a DPOY candidate in Smart.
Russell would be playing in the DLeague too if he wasn’t on the Lakers or 76ers.
And of course I was right about Randle being a bust too, just like I was right about Porzingis being a Hall of Famer even before the regular season started.
I could go on and on.
Even my shakiest prediction, that Andrew Harrison is no worse than D Russell, is to be determined.
But congrats on your #2 pick not being sent down to DLeague yet.
And he probably won’t, since he’s already being showcased for trades, just like Stauskas before him.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:24am #1039911
Magic JordanParticipantDang, they moved Porzingis into the HOF already? I must have missed that announcement.
Lol Rozier.
Man, I would legitimately pay $1500.00 to punch you in the face. I’m sure you’re strapped for cash and your mom is begging for her rent money. Is this an offer you would ever consider?
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:24am #1039776
Magic JordanParticipantDang, they moved Porzingis into the HOF already? I must have missed that announcement.
Lol Rozier.
Man, I would legitimately pay $1500.00 to punch you in the face. I’m sure you’re strapped for cash and your mom is begging for her rent money. Is this an offer you would ever consider?
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:39am #1039977
trappedintheclosetPorzingis is so good from day one that his jersey is the 4th best selling in the league.
I bet you could find a good deal on some DSlow jerseys at the dollar store.
Then you’d have $1499 to pay dudes in West Hollywood to get your kicks.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:39am #1039842
trappedintheclosetPorzingis is so good from day one that his jersey is the 4th best selling in the league.
I bet you could find a good deal on some DSlow jerseys at the dollar store.
Then you’d have $1499 to pay dudes in West Hollywood to get your kicks.
0
-
-
-
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:28am #1039879
trappedintheclosetIf Simmons played for Duke he’d look like the same fool’s gold as Jabari China.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:28am #1039744
trappedintheclosetIf Simmons played for Duke he’d look like the same fool’s gold as Jabari China.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:55am #1039893
Magic JordanParticipantWow. It was really nice without you around T Rex.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:55am #1039758
Magic JordanParticipantWow. It was really nice without you around T Rex.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:59am #1039895
trappedintheclosetHow are Randle and Russell doing, I haven’t been watching the games lately…
Maybe you guys can trade for Jabari Parker.
The future is now!
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:59am #1039760
trappedintheclosetHow are Randle and Russell doing, I haven’t been watching the games lately…
Maybe you guys can trade for Jabari Parker.
The future is now!
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:04am #1039899
Magic JordanParticipantThey are doing much better than Rozier, Mickey, Hunter, Smart, the Harrison Twins…. Need I go on?
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:04am #1039764
Magic JordanParticipantThey are doing much better than Rozier, Mickey, Hunter, Smart, the Harrison Twins…. Need I go on?
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:24am #1039913
trappedintheclosetThe Celtics back end of the roster, which is stuck in dleague, is better than your "core for the future" of Russell and Randle.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:24am #1039778
trappedintheclosetThe Celtics back end of the roster, which is stuck in dleague, is better than your "core for the future" of Russell and Randle.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:26am #1039915
Magic JordanParticipantWhy because you say so?
The roster you said was the best in the East? lol.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:26am #1039780
Magic JordanParticipantWhy because you say so?
The roster you said was the best in the East? lol.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:31am #1039919
trappedintheclosetAfter a slow start the Celtics are 4th, and looking like we’ll have a second half run just like last year. Five game win streak right now. Have the Lakers won 5 games this year?
And the Cavs aren’t exactly unstoppable. New coach, poor chemistry, poor defense, and LeBron is a poor leader, like when he yelled at TThompson the other night. That could all crumble pretty fast.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:31am #1039784
trappedintheclosetAfter a slow start the Celtics are 4th, and looking like we’ll have a second half run just like last year. Five game win streak right now. Have the Lakers won 5 games this year?
And the Cavs aren’t exactly unstoppable. New coach, poor chemistry, poor defense, and LeBron is a poor leader, like when he yelled at TThompson the other night. That could all crumble pretty fast.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 4:09pm #1039932
SpaceghostParticipantKobe never yelled at his teammates..Jordan was always cool with his teammates..Ask the Celtic brass did Larry Legend yell at his teammates.. HAHA yep Lebron is a poor leader though
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 4:09pm #1040067
SpaceghostParticipantKobe never yelled at his teammates..Jordan was always cool with his teammates..Ask the Celtic brass did Larry Legend yell at his teammates.. HAHA yep Lebron is a poor leader though
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:09am #1039869

Sewok15ParticipantIngram will be a nice NBA player for sure but if you think that his effect on the Duke team is greater than Simmons on LSU I have no idea what you are watching. Duke has underachieved this year and I would say both teams are pretty equal when you look at common opponents and watch them play. You have to take into consideration who Ingram is playing with (5 other McDonald’s All Americans) compared to Simmons (One other All American in Blakeny who finally played a good game yesterday).
LSU can’t even get Simmons the ball half the time unless he brings it up the court. He shot 6-7 from the field yesterday which is unacceptable but I think it is on coaching and his teammates as much as his perceived lack of assertiveness. If Simmons were playing for Coach K at Duke they would be a top 10 team and if Ingram were on that LSU team they probably wouldn’t even make the tournament.
I understand the importance of the three point line in the NBA but never would I consider taking Buddy Hield over Simmons because he can shoot better…that is over looking so much about Simmons game that makes him special. I just wish he would have went to play for a good team with a proven coach to showcase his skills better.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:06am #1039903
Magic JordanParticipantYour biggest mistake was at one point in time when you had an honest moment and admitted you were in your mid 30s. Don’t you think it’s time to quit creating accounts on a site nobody wants you on? And start focusing on, I dunno… Maybe getting out of your moms basement?
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 8:06am #1039768
Magic JordanParticipantYour biggest mistake was at one point in time when you had an honest moment and admitted you were in your mid 30s. Don’t you think it’s time to quit creating accounts on a site nobody wants you on? And start focusing on, I dunno… Maybe getting out of your moms basement?
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 9:37am #1039943
ThepessimestParticipantI think the original poster has some legit questions about group think and the danger of continuing to repeat something because the masses has determined it to be true. However; I do want to point out some problems with your evaluation of Ben Simmons. And I say this loving Ingram’s game. I think he has the goods to be the number 1 pick as well.
What you cannot account for is the fact that Ben Simmons is a 6’10 PF who is a shot creator for his team. He finishes at the rim with either hand. He can play essentially any position on the court. And shooting is essentially his only weakness relatively speaking.
While the 3 point shot has become oh so important at all levels of basketball not being elite at that skill does not mean you cannot be an elite basketball player.
It is especially dangerous to suggest that because a guy does not have a certain skill at age 19 that this is who he will be in 2 or 3 years. What if he does develop a jump shot? Is it easier to develop a jump shot or an innate ability to see openings 2 and 3 steps ahead of most everyone else?
While I will not tell you that you are wrong in your assessment I do think your critiques were very strong and spoken in the context of a player not being able to improve a skill.
I’d also caution against slamming the door on Jabari Parker and Okafor as players. Randle I do have concerns about but even he is really young.
Parker’s issues may be system related. Okafor has played extremely well this year around really subpar talent.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 9:37am #1039808
ThepessimestParticipantI think the original poster has some legit questions about group think and the danger of continuing to repeat something because the masses has determined it to be true. However; I do want to point out some problems with your evaluation of Ben Simmons. And I say this loving Ingram’s game. I think he has the goods to be the number 1 pick as well.
What you cannot account for is the fact that Ben Simmons is a 6’10 PF who is a shot creator for his team. He finishes at the rim with either hand. He can play essentially any position on the court. And shooting is essentially his only weakness relatively speaking.
While the 3 point shot has become oh so important at all levels of basketball not being elite at that skill does not mean you cannot be an elite basketball player.
It is especially dangerous to suggest that because a guy does not have a certain skill at age 19 that this is who he will be in 2 or 3 years. What if he does develop a jump shot? Is it easier to develop a jump shot or an innate ability to see openings 2 and 3 steps ahead of most everyone else?
While I will not tell you that you are wrong in your assessment I do think your critiques were very strong and spoken in the context of a player not being able to improve a skill.
I’d also caution against slamming the door on Jabari Parker and Okafor as players. Randle I do have concerns about but even he is really young.
Parker’s issues may be system related. Okafor has played extremely well this year around really subpar talent.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:10am #1039951
trappedintheclosetFor Ben Simmons to play winning ball in the NBA, or college for that matter, you pretty much must surround him with 4 shooters, including a center who can not only shoot the 3 but play good d. Those guys are like unicorns.
It’s kind of like Tim Tebow at quarterback. Great college player, great with the ball in his hands, but you don’t want a QB who can only run, and you don’t want a PF who can only pass, and needs the ball in his hands.
Tebow never made it in the NFL because it would have required teams to build entire rosters and playbooks around him to cater to his weaknesses. Shaping a roster around Simmons is risky, but more importantly very hard to do. Because you need that 3 and D center which are so rare.
Simmons would somewhat fit well on the Celtics with all the stretch bigs they have, but his play style of needing the ball in his hands goes against the Celtics’ philosophy. The Celtics got much better the day they traded Rondo and his precious assist chasing.
Most likely, Simmons will go to a bad team and put up empty stats, while Ingram’s team will overachieve from day 1.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:10am #1039816
trappedintheclosetFor Ben Simmons to play winning ball in the NBA, or college for that matter, you pretty much must surround him with 4 shooters, including a center who can not only shoot the 3 but play good d. Those guys are like unicorns.
It’s kind of like Tim Tebow at quarterback. Great college player, great with the ball in his hands, but you don’t want a QB who can only run, and you don’t want a PF who can only pass, and needs the ball in his hands.
Tebow never made it in the NFL because it would have required teams to build entire rosters and playbooks around him to cater to his weaknesses. Shaping a roster around Simmons is risky, but more importantly very hard to do. Because you need that 3 and D center which are so rare.
Simmons would somewhat fit well on the Celtics with all the stretch bigs they have, but his play style of needing the ball in his hands goes against the Celtics’ philosophy. The Celtics got much better the day they traded Rondo and his precious assist chasing.
Most likely, Simmons will go to a bad team and put up empty stats, while Ingram’s team will overachieve from day 1.
0
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:26am #1039967

TravelinTravParticipantI agree some what with question marks regarding Simmons 3 point shooting and his D, you can make an argument with Ingram going number 1. But just because someone shoots 3’s doesn’t make them great, Jimmer, Reddick, Stauskas, etc ( I’m forgetting some other great 3 point college shooters) non of those guys are great or even good NBA players, Reddick is ok.
This is what makes the draft great, speculating taking a favorite and sticking with your guns. Buddy has turned into my fav pic reminds me of when Curry fell to number 7. I think it will be the same with Buddy, I’m not saying Buddy will be any where as good of play a similar style of Curry, but he will be a real good player in the NBA.
Simmons going 1st will depend on what team lands the 1st pick, he’s a very situational player. I would probably roll the dice and go with Simmons mostly because he’s so unique
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:26am #1039832

TravelinTravParticipantI agree some what with question marks regarding Simmons 3 point shooting and his D, you can make an argument with Ingram going number 1. But just because someone shoots 3’s doesn’t make them great, Jimmer, Reddick, Stauskas, etc ( I’m forgetting some other great 3 point college shooters) non of those guys are great or even good NBA players, Reddick is ok.
This is what makes the draft great, speculating taking a favorite and sticking with your guns. Buddy has turned into my fav pic reminds me of when Curry fell to number 7. I think it will be the same with Buddy, I’m not saying Buddy will be any where as good of play a similar style of Curry, but he will be a real good player in the NBA.
Simmons going 1st will depend on what team lands the 1st pick, he’s a very situational player. I would probably roll the dice and go with Simmons mostly because he’s so unique
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:49am #1039983
trappedintheclosetGuards who can shoot 3s are a dime a dozen. Jimmer will mow your lawn for 10 bucks right now.
Bigs who can shoot threes are changing the game, and they almost always have a positive +/-.
Bargnani is like an extreme case who just happened to come first, so he made every finesse big for the next 5 years look bad. But those 5 years are long gone by now.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:49am #1039848
trappedintheclosetGuards who can shoot 3s are a dime a dozen. Jimmer will mow your lawn for 10 bucks right now.
Bigs who can shoot threes are changing the game, and they almost always have a positive +/-.
Bargnani is like an extreme case who just happened to come first, so he made every finesse big for the next 5 years look bad. But those 5 years are long gone by now.
0
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:37am #1039973
trappedintheclosetI’d be higher on Simmons if I hadn’t seen video of him shooting outside jumpers. And the fact that he doesn’t even seem to work on that part of the game. It’s not that he’s missing a lot of jumpers, it’s also that he’s not even taking them.
He actually seems to have a lot in common with Rondo. Rondo was terrified of free throws, while Simmons is clearly terrified of long jumpers.
Expecting somebody with such a psychological fear of something to drastically improve at that in the NBA is foolhardy. And the 3 point line in the NBA moves waaay back.
A few years ago people probably thought Evan Turner’s outside jumper would come around. He’s shooting like 15% this year.
People also thought Turner’s size + ball handling skills would somehow make him a great player.
Now people just assume that Simmons’ size + guard skills will magically create lots of buckets.
Just like D’Angelo Russell last year. His magic passing was supposed to have some big impact on the game.
It’s much better to have 5 guys that are decent passers than to have one virtuoso who needs the ball in his hands to be effective.
If that’s not clear yet, it should be. Spurs, Warriors, Celtics, and other top teams are all following the same formula of lots of motion and making the extra pass, not the fancy pass.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 10:37am #1039838
trappedintheclosetI’d be higher on Simmons if I hadn’t seen video of him shooting outside jumpers. And the fact that he doesn’t even seem to work on that part of the game. It’s not that he’s missing a lot of jumpers, it’s also that he’s not even taking them.
He actually seems to have a lot in common with Rondo. Rondo was terrified of free throws, while Simmons is clearly terrified of long jumpers.
Expecting somebody with such a psychological fear of something to drastically improve at that in the NBA is foolhardy. And the 3 point line in the NBA moves waaay back.
A few years ago people probably thought Evan Turner’s outside jumper would come around. He’s shooting like 15% this year.
People also thought Turner’s size + ball handling skills would somehow make him a great player.
Now people just assume that Simmons’ size + guard skills will magically create lots of buckets.
Just like D’Angelo Russell last year. His magic passing was supposed to have some big impact on the game.
It’s much better to have 5 guys that are decent passers than to have one virtuoso who needs the ball in his hands to be effective.
If that’s not clear yet, it should be. Spurs, Warriors, Celtics, and other top teams are all following the same formula of lots of motion and making the extra pass, not the fancy pass.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 11:10am #1039995

TarHeelRavenParticipantIf Brandon Ingram is so great, why is Duke so terrible? Duke has like 6 high school all-americans. Ingram is long and can score but what else does he do? He doesn’t defend or rebound. This is probably Duke’s worst defensive team in decades. Didn’t Duke give up like 12 offensive rebounds to Tyler Roberson. Everybody and their mother blames Duke being bad on Amile Jefferson being out. "Just wait, once Jefferson comes back, Duke will be unstoppable!!!" Please. Duke is just bad this year. Kentucky went through it after AD and MKG and Carolina went through it after 09 with Lawson and Hansbrough.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 11:10am #1039860

TarHeelRavenParticipantIf Brandon Ingram is so great, why is Duke so terrible? Duke has like 6 high school all-americans. Ingram is long and can score but what else does he do? He doesn’t defend or rebound. This is probably Duke’s worst defensive team in decades. Didn’t Duke give up like 12 offensive rebounds to Tyler Roberson. Everybody and their mother blames Duke being bad on Amile Jefferson being out. "Just wait, once Jefferson comes back, Duke will be unstoppable!!!" Please. Duke is just bad this year. Kentucky went through it after AD and MKG and Carolina went through it after 09 with Lawson and Hansbrough.
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 12:00pm #1039878
trappedintheclosetIngram can pretty much do it all. He can handle the ball well, he passes well, he blocks shots, his defense is good/great, and he can score from all areas in the half court or open court.
A much smarter question would be, "what can’t he do?"
He doesn’t have gaping holes in his game like Jabari or Simmons or Randle or any number of former top prospects.
And he’s more well rounded than Wiggins. Better outside shot and more length.
His potential is a clear notch above Wiggins.
Because stretching the floor matters, and affects wins and +/-.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 12:00pm #1040013
trappedintheclosetIngram can pretty much do it all. He can handle the ball well, he passes well, he blocks shots, his defense is good/great, and he can score from all areas in the half court or open court.
A much smarter question would be, "what can’t he do?"
He doesn’t have gaping holes in his game like Jabari or Simmons or Randle or any number of former top prospects.
And he’s more well rounded than Wiggins. Better outside shot and more length.
His potential is a clear notch above Wiggins.
Because stretching the floor matters, and affects wins and +/-.
0
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 11:49am #1040005

Snatalini247ParticipantHe’s making me miss T Rex
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 11:49am #1039870

Snatalini247ParticipantHe’s making me miss T Rex
0-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 1:37pm #1039902

holefillers1ParticipantSometimes his comments make me laugh, most of the time I just get tired. Good news is his posts will suck all the negs away from mine.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 1:37pm #1040037

holefillers1ParticipantSometimes his comments make me laugh, most of the time I just get tired. Good news is his posts will suck all the negs away from mine.
0
-
-
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 2:06pm #1039906
Hype MachineLol T-rex is back from rehab.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 2:06pm #1040041
Hype MachineLol T-rex is back from rehab.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 2:33pm #1039918

natevalParticipantWelcome back T-Rex! As a fellow Celtics fan I didn’t believe like you did. You nailed it on a lot of those draft picks too. I can’t hate.
Celtics moved into 3rd tonight?
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 2:33pm #1040053

natevalParticipantWelcome back T-Rex! As a fellow Celtics fan I didn’t believe like you did. You nailed it on a lot of those draft picks too. I can’t hate.
Celtics moved into 3rd tonight?
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 3:49pm #1039928

negguaryParticipantsimmons is too passive. I started the year off very high on him and made several posts about how good I think he an be! But after watching multiple games I realize that his lack of jump shot is a major red flag. I had to remove the emotion and the fact that I am a Ben Simmons fan and realize that he has a lot of work to do if he is going to be successful! At this point Ingram looks like the better prospect overall.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 3:49pm #1040063

negguaryParticipantsimmons is too passive. I started the year off very high on him and made several posts about how good I think he an be! But after watching multiple games I realize that his lack of jump shot is a major red flag. I had to remove the emotion and the fact that I am a Ben Simmons fan and realize that he has a lot of work to do if he is going to be successful! At this point Ingram looks like the better prospect overall.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:10pm #1039976

MopgrassParticipantDespite how it was said, I agree that the game is changing and certain types of players are becoming less useful. However, there is a lot more to basketball than standing at the 3 point line and launching shots. You need players who make things happen, split the defense, and draw attention away from the 3 point shooters. Ben Simmons makes things happen. You need that along with shooters. I agree that Ingram can do both and he’s my favorite too. But I’m not so crazy as to be certain Ingram is better.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:10pm #1040111

MopgrassParticipantDespite how it was said, I agree that the game is changing and certain types of players are becoming less useful. However, there is a lot more to basketball than standing at the 3 point line and launching shots. You need players who make things happen, split the defense, and draw attention away from the 3 point shooters. Ben Simmons makes things happen. You need that along with shooters. I agree that Ingram can do both and he’s my favorite too. But I’m not so crazy as to be certain Ingram is better.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:26pm #1039978
mowestenParticipantThink about this for a minute: Ingram, playing on a team that has a rebounding weakness, is averaging half as many rebounds as Simmons. Duke desperately needs Ingram to rebound for them to be successful, and he either can’t, or won’t do it.
Beyond that, Ingram isn’t much of a ball handler or playmaker. He’s averaging 1/3 as many assists as Simmons. And, despite that great shooting touch, he’s not scoring as many points as Simmons, who is much more efficient.
If those two players traded places, Duke would be a favorite in the NCAA tournament, and LSU would be where Mississippi State is with their five star guard.
Simmons has the innate ability to make players around him better. I don’t see that in Ingram. He’s playing for one of the all-time great coaches and he’s helping his team turn in an all-time turd of a season by Duke standards. Nobody even knows who is coaching LSU, and Simmons is probably going to lead them to at least a tournament berth, which for those guys, is a big deal.
0 -
Posted on: Sun, 01/31/2016 - 7:26pm #1040113
mowestenParticipantThink about this for a minute: Ingram, playing on a team that has a rebounding weakness, is averaging half as many rebounds as Simmons. Duke desperately needs Ingram to rebound for them to be successful, and he either can’t, or won’t do it.
Beyond that, Ingram isn’t much of a ball handler or playmaker. He’s averaging 1/3 as many assists as Simmons. And, despite that great shooting touch, he’s not scoring as many points as Simmons, who is much more efficient.
If those two players traded places, Duke would be a favorite in the NCAA tournament, and LSU would be where Mississippi State is with their five star guard.
Simmons has the innate ability to make players around him better. I don’t see that in Ingram. He’s playing for one of the all-time great coaches and he’s helping his team turn in an all-time turd of a season by Duke standards. Nobody even knows who is coaching LSU, and Simmons is probably going to lead them to at least a tournament berth, which for those guys, is a big deal.
0 -
Posted on: Mon, 02/01/2016 - 5:43am #1040174

The Garbage ManParticipantAs a die hard Celtics fan, this guy is partially embarassing. First of all, Simmons is the next star. He’s not getting involved enough, he’s lacking aggressiveness, and the coach isn’t maximizing his talent. At time it seems they forget they have the best player in the country. Rozier isn’t better than Russell, nor will he EVER be. He’s an average defender, only due to his athleticism, and his jump shot is underwhelming. He’s just way too raw. D-Lo would be an offensive machine if it weren’t from Kobe hogging the ball worse than ’13 Melo. Marcus Smart clearly isn’t better than Harden? Stats. Defense is all that he has over him, and possibly rebounding. Jesus Christ. He be like "Michael Cooper, hands down better than MJ." Shut up….
0 -
Posted on: Mon, 02/01/2016 - 5:43am #1040038

The Garbage ManParticipantAs a die hard Celtics fan, this guy is partially embarassing. First of all, Simmons is the next star. He’s not getting involved enough, he’s lacking aggressiveness, and the coach isn’t maximizing his talent. At time it seems they forget they have the best player in the country. Rozier isn’t better than Russell, nor will he EVER be. He’s an average defender, only due to his athleticism, and his jump shot is underwhelming. He’s just way too raw. D-Lo would be an offensive machine if it weren’t from Kobe hogging the ball worse than ’13 Melo. Marcus Smart clearly isn’t better than Harden? Stats. Defense is all that he has over him, and possibly rebounding. Jesus Christ. He be like "Michael Cooper, hands down better than MJ." Shut up….
0 -
AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |