This topic contains 28 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by aamir543 14 years, 11 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:39pm #31758
Michael.S.ParticipantHoly Crap, what a sad and depressing story. We all know what really happened…Any thoughts or comments?
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:49pm #569859
4th dimensionYou label this thread Off-Topic, yet you still post it in the draft section. We have a Off-Topic section, use it.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:49pm #569987
4th dimensionYou label this thread Off-Topic, yet you still post it in the draft section. We have a Off-Topic section, use it.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:52pm #569863
boshjonesfordParticipanti dont know its always hard to use capital punishment when your not absolutly 100% sure (even if your 80%)…but look on the bright side if she did do it then she will face punishment through psycological tourment because at the end of the day everyone has some form of consious even if they are a cold blooded murderer.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:52pm #569991
boshjonesfordParticipanti dont know its always hard to use capital punishment when your not absolutly 100% sure (even if your 80%)…but look on the bright side if she did do it then she will face punishment through psycological tourment because at the end of the day everyone has some form of consious even if they are a cold blooded murderer.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:54pm #569867
Stojakovicfor3ParticipantI think she’s guilty. She kept changing her story. First, she left Caylee with a friend, then a nanny who doesnt exist stole her and now she drowned. It just doesn’t make sense. If my kid drowned, I wouldn’t put chloroform and duct tape on her and toss her in the woods, I would do the right thing and report her absence. It’s ridiculous that they just set her free IMO. But only god and Caylee know what really happened
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:54pm #569995
Stojakovicfor3ParticipantI think she’s guilty. She kept changing her story. First, she left Caylee with a friend, then a nanny who doesnt exist stole her and now she drowned. It just doesn’t make sense. If my kid drowned, I wouldn’t put chloroform and duct tape on her and toss her in the woods, I would do the right thing and report her absence. It’s ridiculous that they just set her free IMO. But only god and Caylee know what really happened
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:54pm #569869

I May Be WrongParticipantstaging.nbadraft.net/forum/opinions-casey-anthony-being-acquitted-murder
It has been created before. but to answer your question, such a sad story and def. is going to be one of those stories that keeps your head scratching 20 years from now
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:54pm #569997

I May Be WrongParticipantstaging.nbadraft.net/forum/opinions-casey-anthony-being-acquitted-murder
It has been created before. but to answer your question, such a sad story and def. is going to be one of those stories that keeps your head scratching 20 years from now
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:56pm #569873
boshjonesfordParticipant -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:56pm #570001
boshjonesfordParticipant -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:00pm #569879

JNixonParticipant -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:00pm #570007

JNixonParticipant -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:18pm #569881

llperez
I think shes guilty as hell. I dont know why we are all the sudden supposed to beleive like her 4th story of what happened after she has been proven to lie non stop without hesitation. Even if she didnt kill the kid, she is about as horrible as you can get seeing as how she didnt report her missing child and partied non stop. Hope she gets hers eventually.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:18pm #570009

llperez
I think shes guilty as hell. I dont know why we are all the sudden supposed to beleive like her 4th story of what happened after she has been proven to lie non stop without hesitation. Even if she didnt kill the kid, she is about as horrible as you can get seeing as how she didnt report her missing child and partied non stop. Hope she gets hers eventually.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:46pm #569895

PlatypusParticipanthow high was the jury because i want some of that
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:46pm #570023

PlatypusParticipanthow high was the jury because i want some of that
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 8:16pm #569907
boshjonesfordParticipantIts easy to blame the jury but if was the jury i would hasitate to prosicute a gulity person unless i knew a 100 percent cause other i would think about it too much because one of the most imporat things in law is to remember thats it is always better to let a guilty person go free rather then prosicuting and innocent person (not saying she is guilty or anything i just dont know)
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 8:16pm #570035
boshjonesfordParticipantIts easy to blame the jury but if was the jury i would hasitate to prosicute a gulity person unless i knew a 100 percent cause other i would think about it too much because one of the most imporat things in law is to remember thats it is always better to let a guilty person go free rather then prosicuting and innocent person (not saying she is guilty or anything i just dont know)
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 8:29pm #569913

JNixonParticipantShe was guilty, AS HELL. There was so much evidence that pointed to her killing the girl it made no sense. There are loopholes in the law system, and sometimes people play into the loopholes so much that they overlook the obvious. Classic case was this trial. I think the people who write the laws are so intricate that things slip through the cracks in investigations, but I highly doubt the law was intentionally written that way. Even the way she looked when they let her off showed that she was guilty. She looked relieved when they let her off, happy. If she honestly didn’t do it, wouldn’t she still be distraught that her own daughter was killed and the killer is supposedly still out roaming the Earth? Why didn’t she cry until the last day? When they weren’t discussing her she looked calm, but when they were discussing her that’s when she cried. Either she’s extremely selfish, or an extremely selfish cold-hearted child killer. And I think it’s the latter.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 8:29pm #570041

JNixonParticipantShe was guilty, AS HELL. There was so much evidence that pointed to her killing the girl it made no sense. There are loopholes in the law system, and sometimes people play into the loopholes so much that they overlook the obvious. Classic case was this trial. I think the people who write the laws are so intricate that things slip through the cracks in investigations, but I highly doubt the law was intentionally written that way. Even the way she looked when they let her off showed that she was guilty. She looked relieved when they let her off, happy. If she honestly didn’t do it, wouldn’t she still be distraught that her own daughter was killed and the killer is supposedly still out roaming the Earth? Why didn’t she cry until the last day? When they weren’t discussing her she looked calm, but when they were discussing her that’s when she cried. Either she’s extremely selfish, or an extremely selfish cold-hearted child killer. And I think it’s the latter.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 9:05pm #569926
Johnny ChillYes/No?
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 9:05pm #570055
Johnny ChillYes/No?
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 10:31pm #569940
frogmanParticipantSuch a sad story. Ive only recently started doing law subjects at uni and have found so many loop holes in every case i have examined. In my eyes she was much less obviously guilty than OJ. Great lawyers can pull off what seems like the impossible in some cases.
Personal opinion – I think she was guilty but if there is any doubt in the jurys mind they must state not guilty. It is a lot more complex than just every individual on the jurys personal opinon on whether she was guilty or not so dont blame them.
BTW it makes me so thankful that I live in a jurisdiction where the death penalty is not an option. If she was found guilty and given the death penalty (which seemed like a decent possibility for a while) it would have made me sick.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 10:31pm #570070
frogmanParticipantSuch a sad story. Ive only recently started doing law subjects at uni and have found so many loop holes in every case i have examined. In my eyes she was much less obviously guilty than OJ. Great lawyers can pull off what seems like the impossible in some cases.
Personal opinion – I think she was guilty but if there is any doubt in the jurys mind they must state not guilty. It is a lot more complex than just every individual on the jurys personal opinon on whether she was guilty or not so dont blame them.
BTW it makes me so thankful that I live in a jurisdiction where the death penalty is not an option. If she was found guilty and given the death penalty (which seemed like a decent possibility for a while) it would have made me sick.
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 11:49pm #569956

kanyedabestParticipant@ johnny chill…… ya prolly LOOL
0 -
Posted on: Tue, 07/12/2011 - 11:49pm #570086

kanyedabestParticipant@ johnny chill…… ya prolly LOOL
0 -
Posted on: Wed, 07/13/2011 - 11:03am #570379
aamir543ParticipantWait, we all know she did it. I agree there is a lack of evidence but who gives sh!t. If the jury said she was guilty, would there be backlash, I don’t think so.
And Iggy was right, Grandpa summed it up best.
0 -
Posted on: Wed, 07/13/2011 - 11:03am #570511
aamir543ParticipantWait, we all know she did it. I agree there is a lack of evidence but who gives sh!t. If the jury said she was guilty, would there be backlash, I don’t think so.
And Iggy was right, Grandpa summed it up best.
0 -
AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |